The ring

Copy citation

When you start a project like this, the most uncertain question is whether the institutions you most want to stand with will pick up the phone.

That question has been answered, in the past three weeks, with a clarity I did not expect this early.

Across April, in conversation order: the Heritage Crafts Association issued a formal endorsement and circulated TEA to their members through their bulletin. The South Downs National Park Authority moved from polite interest into an active partnership documenting the rangers at Stanmer Park. The Guild of Handicraft Trust proposed Chipping Campden as a beta site for the archive’s craft documentation methodology. The British Watchmakers opened their network and made introductions to the National Association of Jewellers and the Goldsmiths Company. The Company of Cutlers in Hallamshire shared its full Sheffield maker list and offered Cutlers’ Hall as exhibition space. The British Artist Blacksmiths Association opened its network through the chairman and the secretary.

This week, two more conversations shifted the project into a different register.

On Tuesday afternoon, the Museum of English Rural Life at the University of Reading confirmed that TEA will go to its Acquisitions Committee in May. Caroline Gould, the Principal Archivist, and Ollie Douglas, the Curator of Collections, both joined the call. We discussed the gaps in MERL’s existing photographic holdings and where TEA naturally sits. We discussed the Wye Valley film project Ollie is making now, and whether TEA might contribute alongside it. We discussed a podcast invitation. Caroline asked about the plan for the archive after my own working life ends, and that is a question I now know how to answer.

A few hours later, Amy Bicknell at the Queen Elizabeth Scholarship Trust agreed to introduce TEA into the QEST scholar network. QEST has invested in 800 makers across 130 craft disciplines over 35 years. Their patron is HM The King. Their annual fundraiser is held at the V&A. The natural overlap is exact.

Each of these conversations on its own would be a significant moment. Together, in three weeks, they form what I have come to think of as the institutional ring around the archive, a small constellation of organisations who recognise what this work is and have decided, quietly, to stand alongside it.

The work itself is what earned this. Seven Makers fully documented in five weeks of fieldwork. A registered CIC. A growing online archive that anyone, anywhere, can read.

We are still at the beginning. The Acquisitions Committee meets in May and that decision is theirs. The QEST relationship is open but unbuilt. Nothing is signed, and most of what comes next will need months of patience.

But the question of whether the institutions would answer is no longer open. They have answered, all of them, in the same direction.